The editorial issues quietly costing you citations. Catches grammar, factual accuracy, and misleading claims across published content so LLMs grade your authority correctly.
A walkthrough of EditRight in action.
LLMs do not just read your content. They assess it. Grammar mistakes, factual errors, misleading claims, and clumsy prose all signal low quality and quietly drop you out of citation consideration. This is the battle of a thousand cuts most editorial teams are not fighting.
EditRight runs that battle. Drop in a single URL or bulk-upload your full content library. The tool scans every page for grammar, spelling, factual accuracy, and misleading claims, with a compliance layer for regulated categories. Each issue is scored high, medium, or low impact and surfaced inline so the editorial team sees the exact passage, the exact problem, and the recommended fix.
It solves two problems at once. Published content needs cleanup now because the LLMs are reading it now. Internal editorial standards need to evolve because the team writes new content every week. EditRight handles both. It cleans the existing catalog while internal processes catch up, so authority signals improve across thousands of pages rather than only the ones in active editorial review.
Every EditRight run returns four categories of editorial flags, each scored by impact so the team can fix what matters first.
The basic quality signals LLMs evaluate. Errors here cost you nothing visible but drop your content's perceived authority on every retrieval.
Claims that can be cross-checked and disputed. Catching these before an LLM does protects your authority and your reputation in equal measure.
Overpromises, unsubstantiated assertions, and regulated-category flags. Essential in healthcare, legal, finance, and any category with disclosure requirements.
Every flag is rated high, medium, or low. Editorial teams fix the high-impact issues first, so the work compounds into citation gains faster.
EditRight is a day-one tool. It audits the existing catalog in Foundation, runs ongoing review through Authority and Scale, and stays on as continuous monitoring in the moat-building phase.
Bulk-audit the existing content catalog top to bottom. The high-impact flags get fixed first, lifting citation eligibility on thousands of pages in weeks.
Every new page runs through EditRight before publishing. The editorial team adopts the tool as standard QA. Quality signals stabilize across the catalog.
Continuous monitoring catches new issues introduced by team writes or third-party contributions. The catalog stays clean as it scales.
A discovery call walks through an EditRight scan on a sample of your published content and shows the editorial flags that are quietly affecting your AI visibility today.
Book a Call Or run the free AI Visibility Audit first to see your current citation share.